from in- ‘in’ + pars, part- ‘part.’

the rough and thorough search to the beginning.

at this insurgence of stimuli, overwhelmed, i await direction from voice as the infiltration of such knowledge filters itself into some recipe of understanding — some communicative value that becomes more than just the self — even more than just the relationship between viewer and image.

in the commute. in the ‘a’ to ‘b’, what remains constant? for that matter, in the upheaval. in the drastic deportation or emigration to a new sovereignty, what remains constant? how must the voice change inorder to remain effectual, real, unabashed?

comments for this post are currently closed.